For What It's Worth - Week 4
October 14, 2026
Hey neighbor,
For what it's worth, last week, I talked to anyone that was willing to pick up the phone with one question in mind: In the next 10 years, how do you expect Northwest Missouri to change — and how do you hope it will?
Funny thing — nearly everybody started in the exact same place.
"Well, I would imagine there would be more data centers."
"I think the expectation is data centers... there's the economic ramifications of higher utilities from the influx of data centers."
One commenter on Facebook was blunter: "No data centers!" She's worried about the noise, the light, and what they do to the animals and the land around them: "I think we need more green and open spaces, not more things like large scale agriculture, data centers, parking lots, etc."
Truly, the fear is understandable. For anyone who thinks otherwise, consider Y2K hysteria and the freak-out that surrounded the rise of the internet back in the day—I presume, at least, there was a freak-out, but I was 5 years old at the time, and my biggest fear was broccoli and clowns.
But seriously, data centers are a controversial topic for a reason. On the one hand, the economic and environmental ramifications do exist for local communities. A quick Google search has this to say: “A single large hyperscale data center uses 1 million to 5 million gallons of water per day under peak or hot conditions (equivalent to the daily usage of a town of 10,000 to 50,000 people), while medium-sized facilities consume 300,000 to 500,000 gallons per day.” Imagine Andrew County doubling in size tomorrow with no significant investment in water and electricity infrastructure to support that growth.
On the other hand, half the country suggests that fear of data centers is a made-up hysteria, fueled by foreign influences that want to “keep America from winning the AI Race.” Here’s my concern with that train of thought: let’s say it’s true, that China and Russia are spending millions on a media campaign to persuade Americans on public policy; doesn’t that signal a massive issue in the corruptibility of the average American? And further, what does that say about the next decade of American life?
To make matters worse, low energy costs and availability of land in the Midwest make Northwest Missouri a prime target for data centers. We love living here because things cost less; corporations may love it for the same reasons.
However, not all was doom and gloom on the topic. One neighbor wasn't certain either way on if the trend was a net negative or potentially a positive: "I'm not sure. I'm really not sure. I think they need to be regulated... I can understand why people would not want to live next to the data center. I also think they're positives to it... there's not enough known yet." Her hope was that, the way wind and solar money did before them, they'd help pay for schools, because "public schools are in a terrible money crunch right now."
Are data centers the same sort of revenue dance-with-the-devil for local schools as windmills and solar? That’s above my pay grade, sadly.
The schools were actually her biggest worry of all — not the data centers. "I think private schools have become a huge problem. I think [specific local corporations] have done everything they can to destroy the public schools in Northwest Missouri. And I think they've bought politicians for it." The caller mentioned a specific local corporation by name but 1) I’m not an investigative journalist and 2) I’m not trying to get sued by that corporation. If you’re big enough to influence local and state policy, you’re big enough to launch a frivolous lawsuit against a small-town blogger. Can’t sink my ship this early in the game.
Though, the question remains an ethical one for me: should families be able to use their money to shape local schools to support better education for (mainly) families in their socioeconomic bracket? I have the same question about healthcare, infrastructure, and just about every facet of modern life. Personally, I believe money should be able to buy your family a better future; but it shouldn’t be able to rob someone else’s family to do so. A better tomorrow doesn’t need to be a zero-sum game.
Another caller expects the agricultural farms to keep folding into fewer hands: "we're seeing more and more of a consolidation of agriculture... I think I see a continued population decline in the rural areas as farms consolidate."
If you grew up in Andrew County or rural parts of Buchanan County, you’ve seen it—families that are able to pass their farms down to the next generation have become slimmer and slimmer. I won’t pretend to know why that trend is happening, though I do see it as a serious red flag, both for the average citizen and for rural communities more generally.
Then I asked what the caller hoped for, and the whole tone changed.
Bike trails, of all things: "I really hope we start to see more of a development of our infrastructure for hiking and biking." There's a possible MoDOT project that would connect Andrew County to Buchanan County along the old railroad tracks, and maybe someday, on into Iowa's trail network. "A bike trail's just kind of like an adult playground... It promotes physical activity. So that's a great thing for our community."
Now, some naysayers might point out that perhaps bike trails and parks are not Northwest Missouri’s number one priority; perhaps there’s a degree of truth to that. But imagine this: you and your family are struggling to make ends meet and you’re constantly working to keep up your family’s quality of life. One of your children suggests “We should go play outside more!” You might think you’re right to say “Sorry child, we don’t have time for fun activities like that.” But you’d be wrong. Even in the midst of those struggling moments in life, you have to take time to enjoy life. Few families move to Northwest Missouri just to survive; they choose this region because they want to enjoy the community as much as possible while they continue building their lives. Bike trails may seem like a silly priority; but I say, they’re the icing on the cake.
Under one Facebook post I made: "It need more shops for More tourism." "More shops would be great. Continued sports dominance!!!!!" "Hopefully, more ethnic diversity. And more tolerance of differences." And one hope for more young families having their kids here, with grandparents moving close enough to spoil them.
The first caller landed on the simplest hope of all. As Kansas City grows, "people do like to move to smaller communities... I would hope that the population would increase."
I keep coming back to the dairy that closed up in Andrew County — the last one, far as I know. That kind of change doesn't announce itself. It just quietly becomes the way things are now. The data centers will announce themselves, all right. What struck me is that nobody's hope list had them on it. The hopes were trails and shops and strong schools and grandkids close by. Small things. Local things. Maybe that's the real answer to the question — the next ten years will bring whatever they bring, and the part we actually get a say in is whether the small things survive it.
Next week’s question follows from that sentiment:
If Northwest Missouri didn’t have [blank], my family wouldn’t want to live here?
New callers every week. If you know who I should talk to, have a question I should ask, or want to answer one yourself, let me know. Share this with anyone who might enjoy it — and if someone forwarded it to you, sign up at fwiwletter.com. You know the drill—call (816.667.6247), text, email, carrier pigeon, whatever it takes, let me know your answer.
Until next week, stay busy.
Brent Rosenauer
For What It's Worth
Realtor · Stroud & Associates
c. 816.667.6247